How To Incite A Race Riot
Anger is a powerful tool, and those who have been blinded by it are easily manipulated, as the gentleman in the video above discovered. He claims that the Black Lives Matters group, and many others, including White supremacist groups, have been infiltrated and are being led by others behind the scenes to accomplish a hidden goal of destroying America. Many are shocked and amazed by this man's statements, while many others have their doubts. How can we know if what he is saying is true? As with many other things, we can look to history for an answer. Six decades ago, Manning Johnson was "a God-serving and patriotic American Negro who was enticed into Communism with Utopian promises, who worked his way up to the high echelons of the conspiracy, then suddenly and dramatically saw through the blandishments. That was the day Manning Johnson faced the jolting realization that he was being used as an activist in the plot to destroy his native land." After realizing what was happening, he quit the Communist Party and traveled the United States, speaking to people of all races, encouraging them to look to God, to be kind to one another, and to take responsibility for themselves. He wanted the people to not get caught up in "the dole" (welfare), and hatred for others. You can read his book, Color, Communism, and Common Sense, at http://www.manningjohnson.org, and hear an address he gave before he passed away. Unfortunately, his was not an isolated case, and he warned Black Americans that they were (and are) being used to destroy America, just as the man in the video, above. Most members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are sadly unfamiliar with an address given by then-Apostle Ezra Taft Benson, during General Conference in Sept. 1967, entitled, "Civil Rights: Tool of Communist Deception," where he warns of this situation, as well. So, yes. History tells us that what this man says is most likely true. Conspirators are like parasites, eating their host organizations from the inside, and they will use any means they can. As described in great detail in the book, The Naked Communist, by W. Cleon Skousen, every Communist takeover has risen on the heels of discontent, by convincing a group that they have been oppressed–whether or not it's true–and that violence is the solution. This is how every Millennial's favorite commie, Ché Guevara, rose to power. As did Fidel Castro, Pol Pot, and the rest. Interestingly, this tactic can be seen all throughout the Book of Mormon, as well. "Dissenters," as they are called, are often found "stirring the people up to anger." We encourage you to read the resources linked to above, and share what you learn with your family, friends, and neighbors. We encourage you to engage with the unawakened in a civil manner, because many of them have good intentions, but are being secretly led to bring about their own destruction. Finally, we encourage you to watch the documentary, Accidental Courtesy. It is the true story of Daryl Davis, a Black American who decided to go out and meet members of the KKK face-to-face. To date, he has had 200 of them quit the Klan and send him their robes. This is the only real solution to issues like racism, and we encourage this patient, kind, respectful approach. But that's not the only reason we want you to see the film. The very end contains a surprise meeting between Daryl Davis and some leaders from Black Lives Matters, which shows what they are really about.
How To Incite A Race Riot
Anger is a powerful tool, and those who have been blinded by it are easily manipulated, as the gentleman in the video above discovered. He claims that the Black Lives Matters group, and many others, including White supremacist groups, have been infiltrated and are being led by others behind the scenes to accomplish a hidden goal of destroying America. Many are shocked and amazed by this man's statements, while many others have their doubts. How can we know if what he is saying is true? As with many other things, we can look to history for an answer. Six decades ago, Manning Johnson was "a God-serving and patriotic American Negro who was enticed into Communism with Utopian promises, who worked his way up to the high echelons of the conspiracy, then suddenly and dramatically saw through the blandishments. That was the day Manning Johnson faced the jolting realization that he was being used as an activist in the plot to destroy his native land." After realizing what was happening, he quit the Communist Party and traveled the United States, speaking to people of all races, encouraging them to look to God, to be kind to one another, and to take responsibility for themselves. He wanted the people to not get caught up in "the dole" (welfare), and hatred for others. You can read his book, Color, Communism, and Common Sense, at http://www.manningjohnson.org, and hear an address he gave before he passed away. Unfortunately, his was not an isolated case, and he warned Black Americans that they were (and are) being used to destroy America, just as the man in the video, above. Most members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are sadly unfamiliar with an address given by then-Apostle Ezra Taft Benson, during General Conference in Sept. 1967, entitled, "Civil Rights: Tool of Communist Deception," where he warns of this situation, as well. So, yes. History tells us that what this man says is most likely true. Conspirators are like parasites, eating their host organizations from the inside, and they will use any means they can. As described in great detail in the book, The Naked Communist, by W. Cleon Skousen, every Communist takeover has risen on the heels of discontent, by convincing a group that they have been oppressed–whether or not it's true–and that violence is the solution. This is how every Millennial's favorite commie, Ché Guevara, rose to power. As did Fidel Castro, Pol Pot, and the rest. Interestingly, this tactic can be seen all throughout the Book of Mormon, as well. "Dissenters," as they are called, are often found "stirring the people up to anger." We encourage you to read the resources linked to above, and share what you learn with your family, friends, and neighbors. We encourage you to engage with the unawakened in a civil manner, because many of them have good intentions, but are being secretly led to bring about their own destruction. Finally, we encourage you to watch the documentary, Accidental Courtesy. It is the true story of Daryl Davis, a Black American who decided to go out and meet members of the KKK face-to-face. To date, he has had 200 of them quit the Klan and send him their robes. This is the only real solution to issues like racism, and we encourage this patient, kind, respectful approach. But that's not the only reason we want you to see the film. The very end contains a surprise meeting between Daryl Davis and some leaders from Black Lives Matters, which shows what they are really about.
You Are GUILTY
A terrible precedent has been set in America, and it needs to die a quick death. It is the presumption of guilt. We used to be a country that believed in the foundational principle of presumptive innocence. As in "innocent until proven guilty." This important principle is at the very root of the three pillars of our Constitutional society: life, liberty, and property (also referred to as "the pursuit of happiness"). Without the presumption of innocence, these three can be taken from us for any reason. Sadly, we are now a country that practices and allows the presumption of guilt. CPS Know anyone who has had CPS (Child "Protective" Services) called on them? How did that go for them? It usually happens like this: 1. Someone calls CPS. There is no step 2. In the eyes of the state, you are now a criminal, and must prove your innocence through a series of long, drawn out, invasive interrogations, court visits, and usually the loss of your children for any period of time, up to and including permanently. Hopefully you have the time and money to endure this experience before your children are doled out to foster care, or worse. (But that doesn't really happen, right?) Why is this a problem? Do you hate children? Not at all, but to protect innocent citizens from heinous government overreach, the burden of proof must be on the accuser. That is why, under Constitutional law, a warrant must be obtained, and it cannot be obtained on hearsay. People can be nasty to each other, and lies roll easily off the tongue. In Idaho alone, over 80% of CPS cases are fraudulent! But those > 80% go through the same experience as the < 20% who are guilty. But that's just one situation where we are presumed guilty. Let's look at some others. Homeschooling At a recent Harvard event, a professor Elizabeth Bartholet suggested that the state should assume authority over our children, and take that authority from parents. Why? Because, she asserts, we should presume parents are ignorant child abusers. It is an unbelievable statement, so feel free to read the link. Fair warning: you will come out of that article with fewer IQ points than when you went in. Once again, guilt should be presumed. The price? The ability to raise our children as we see fit. Instead, they must be indoctrinated by the state like all the other good little kiddies in public school. You know, the ones who are learning about deviant sex acts and idolizing Communists. Black Lives Matter The very concept of "Systemic racism" presumes guilt on the part of all "White" people, and apparently justifies assaults on innocent victims, and the destruction of their personal property. Wait, that sounds familiar… Oh yeah, we said it earlier: "Without the presumption of innocence, all three [life, liberty, and property] can be taken from us for any reason." All while the police are "standing by." Chad Daybell & Lori Vallow…? Because this principle is so vital to our freedom, it is important that we apply it consistently, even in unpopular situations. In the oldest Idaho Statesman article we could find mentioning Daybell, dated Dec. 20, 2019, we learn that they were under investigation for the following reasons: • "Rexburg Police tried to conduct a welfare check on Joshua Vallow, Lori Vallow’s adopted 7-year-old special-needs son" at the request of "[r]elatives outside of Idaho". • And "the parents… repeatedly lied about the whereabouts of the children." When did it become the purview of the police to check on the whereabouts of our children? Is it any of their business? Are we required by law to tell them when asked? Is this any different than the CPS visits mentioned above? The answers, as far as we can tell, are Never, No, No, and No. Please correct us if we are mistaken. The fact that they performed the checkup visit, and then attempted to verify that the kids were with their relatives, demonstrates a presumption of guilt. The article states that the police returned with a warrant the following day, which is curious since no evidence of wrongdoing was mentioned, just the suspicions of family members. The couple themselves said the "allegations" were "speculation and rumor", which shows that there was not previous evidence. According to that article: “The couple is also connected to two active death investigations involving both of their former spouses — one in Fremont County and another in Maricopa County, Arizona. However, authorities in both jurisdictions say Chad and Lori are not persons of interest or suspects in those cases. No charges have been filed against Chad or Lori in Idaho or Arizona. So far, Rexburg Police have only indicated they want to talk with the couple to ensure the children are OK.” Suspicions and hearsay are not legal qualifications for an investigation, let alone the subsequent taxpayer expense to fly to Hawaii to apprehend Lori Vallow, dig up yards, and whatever else has been involved. Lucky for the police, their "belief" (as it is called in the Statesman article) may have turned out to be correct in this case. But what if it wasn't? Would we support this form of legal abuse if they were innocent? What if they are? We don't actually know at this point. And if they are guilty, does that excuse the presumption of guilt, and all that that entails?
What's Wrong With Hate Crime Laws?
An Irish website recently posted a fantastic article, outlining why they oppose "hate crime" laws. We think they make excellent points, so we are re-publishing the article here, in its entirety: 10 reasons hate crime laws are terrifying nonsense Posted by John McGuirk | Nov 16, 2020 | Comment Ireland, Irish News On Friday, we reported on the contents of Fianna Fáil’s new Hate Crime Bill, which will be debated in the Seanad this week. Ahead of that debate, it is worth setting out for our readers why we at Gript believe hate crime laws are one of the worst ideas ever introduced by Irish politicians. Here are ten reasons why they should be opposed, at all cost: 1. They criminalise thought – unlike any other law Say what you want about hate speech laws, but they don’t criminalise thought. To fall foul of a hate speech law you have to actually say something and be heard say it. There must be actual evidence that you said the criminal thing. The same goes for pretty much every other crime. Not so with hate crime laws. The crime in a hate crime is not what you did, it is what you thought. To successfully prosecute a hate crime, you must prove that the person who committed the crime was motivated by hate. But only a particular kind of hate, because…. 2. Only some kinds of hate are illegal Imagine a situation where a husband finds out that his wife has been sleeping with another man. Imagine that the husband then seeks out that other man, and physically assaults him. What is the motive there? Is it jealousy? Or is it hate? It is perfectly possible that a spurned husband might be acting with malice, and out of hate. But under the law, that would not be a hate crime. It is only a hate crime if the victim is in a protected group. Paradoxically, if the husband beat up a racial minority and declared that he did so because he hated him for sleeping with his wife, that’s not a hate crime, even though the crime has been committed with hate in the attacker’s heart. It’s only a hate crime if your hate is directed at a specific group, not an individual. But on the other hand, if in the course of beating him up, he called him a racial slur, it would be a hate crime. Makes sense, right? 3. Hate is a feeling. What other feelings are criminal? Love. Hate. Jealousy. Anger. Lust. What do these have in common? They’re all feelings. Nearly every crime is motivated by feelings of some sort or other. Why are we only legislating to make one negative feeling criminal? If a corrupt politician is guilty of lining his pockets, why is that just “corruption” instead of, say, a “greed crime”? If a man is arrested for visiting prostitutes, why is that simply solicitation, instead of “lust crime?” Those concepts are absurd, of course. Nobody would ever introduce a “greed crime” law because the idea of criminalising feelings is nonsensical, even when they are negative feelings. So why are we trying to do it with hate? 4. No other crime is judged purely by motive Even in America, where they have first, second, and third degree murder, crimes are not ranked by motive. If you kill and dismember somebody because, like Hannibal Lecter, you’re a cannibal, then your cannibalism isn’t taken into account. You don’t get more time or less time than somebody who kills and dismembers a person because, say, they wanted to inherit the victim’s money. Greed or cannibalism – the motive doesn’t matter. Only what you did. The only time motive matters is if it is exculpatory – for example, the classic example of someone speeding to the hospital because there’s a woman in labour in the car. But there is no other crime where the motive itself is the crime. It is not a crime to want your parents to leave you all their money in their will. It’s only a crime if you forge their will before or after they die. In every other area of criminal law, the action, not the motive, is the crime. This has served us well for two thousand years. 5. They create protected classes of citizens Imagine two people, who have both had their legs broken with a sledgehammer. One is a little old lady who has been attacked by thugs who tortured her to get her to reveal the money she had under her mattress. The other is a gay man who’s been attacked by people who hate gay people. Both crimes are horrendous, but hate crime laws make it so that one of them has actually suffered a worse crime than the other. Is that true? Hate crime laws by definition elevate one group of victims above another, and make it so that one of those crimes carries an additional sentence. The little old lady, in this scenario, actually gets less justice because she’s not gay, or black, or a traveller, or whatever. Is that right? Of course, it’s not. 6. They require juries to breach the “reasonable doubt” standard Human beings are not mind readers. There is, simply, no scenario known to man where one person can be completely sure what another person was thinking at the time they committed a particular act. Hate crimes must be prosecuted purely on the basis of what somebody was thinking when they committed a particular crime. But a criminal conviction, in front of a jury, must meet the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of proof. In what situation can there be no reasonable doubt about what somebody was thinking when they committed a crime? The reason that court cases proceed on the basis of physical, forensic, and expert evidence is that those things can be established beyond reasonable doubt. We can say for certain that person X was in a particular location at a particular time. We can say that their DNA is certainly at the crime scene. We can say that the crime was committed at a certain time. We can prove that somebody said something. All of those things are provable. It is impossible to prove what somebody was thinking at a particular time. A jury that says that they have no reasonable doubt about someone’s thoughts or motives is a jury that is lying. 7. They pre-judge the accused, and there is basically no possible defence Dear reader: Tell me, now, what the evidence is that you, reading this, do not hate Chinese people. Imagine you are in court, accused of a hate crime. You stand accused of holding hateful views about Chinese people. The evidence presented is that you had posted on facebook three times in 2011 about animal welfare abuse in China, and once, five years ago, you had referred to Chinese athletes as “Chinks” in a whatsapp conversation about the Olympics. The prosecution says this is evidence that you have prejudice against Chinese people. How do you disprove that? You basically end up like Father Ted, in front of the jury, desperately trying to prove that you are not a racist. But how do you do it? Have a think about that one, while you consider point 8: 8. They do nothing to actually prevent hate crimes Here’s the thing about most crimes: The people who commit them do not particularly expect to get caught. Be honest with yourself, dear reader: How many times have you personally broken the speed limit? Did the limit deter you, or did you think “it’s 1.30am, nobody’s on the road, doing 130kph instead of 120kph is worth the risk”. And that’s only a minor crime. Very few people who commit serious crime expect to get caught. And as such, the criminal penalties aren’t actually a deterrent. Making drug use illegal has not resulted in drug use becoming extinct. Similarly, you can’t legislate and criminalise racism and bigotry out of existence. Besides, hate crimes are already illegal. If you attack and injure somebody, then that is already a crime. If those crimes are still happening, then that suggests that the law has little deterrent effect as it is. Adding another sticker on to it is not going to have any impact. 9. They turn minority groups into victim classes, regardless of actual status Hate crime laws actually reinforce societal divisions by formalising in law the idea that some groups of people are in a victim class, while others are in an oppressor class. This is not true in practice, and the concept of such a demarcation risks undermining social cohesion. Try explaining to a poor homeless white person why the state is creating special crimes to protect the wealthy gay couple who live in the apartment block in the door of which the homeless person seeks shelter. The idea that somebody is more of a victim in society purely because of their gender identity, sexual orientation, skin colour, or religion completely ignores the competing socio-economic circumstances of people living in a country. In time, this will breed more resentment than it does tolerance. 10. They create a horrible precedent If “hate” itself is a crime, then what’s the argument for limiting “hate crimes” to simply acts of violence? Already we see moves to criminalise speech, and journalism, and words because they are hateful, even though they are inherently non-violent. But why stop at words? In fact, why stop at actions at all? What if inaction is perceived to be motivated by hate? For example, what about a teacher or a college lecturer who refuses to wear a rainbow pin on their collar during LGBTI awareness week? Surely a reasonable person can infer from that some level of opposition to the LGBTI cause, no? Does it rise to hate? Who knows, but surely it’s worthy of investigation? What about somebody who laughs at a racist joke? Obviously the person who tells the racist joke is guilty, in this new regime, of hate speech. But what about the person who finds it funny, and laughs? Are they not likely to come under suspicion, too? It all comes back, in the end, to point one: Hate crime laws are thought crime laws. They make thinking certain things, in some circumstances, criminally prosecutable. Once we open that door, and say that yes, some thoughts are criminal, we will find it very hard to close again. Original: https://gript.ie/10-reasons-hate-crime-laws-are-terrifying-nonsense/ The prophet Isaiah warned us that Satan seeks to "make a man an offender for a word." (Isa. 29:21) This has always been so, and it is even so now.
Coronavirus, Eugenics, Surveillance, and Propaganda
Governments knew there would be lots of adverse reactions to the Coronavirus vaccine. So, why are they still pushing it on people? Why are they working with a CIA-funded tech company to perform contact tracing? What does any of this have to do with you? Please donate today! https://liberapay.com/defendingidaho/donate ============= France: Only 500 People Willing to Take COVID-19 Vaccine https://needtoknow.news/2021/01/france-only-500-people-willing-to-take-covid-19-vaccine Doctors in Boston and in Mexico Have Life-Threatening Reactions to RNA COVID-19 Vaccines. Mexican Doctor Is Reported Paralyzed. https://needtoknow.news/2021/01/doctors-in-boston-and-in-mexico-have-life-threatening-reactions-to-rna-covid-19-vaccines 88-year-old dies hours after vaccine; doctors stress he was seriously ill https://www.timesofisrael.com/88-year-old-dies-hours-after-vaccine-doctors-stress-he-was-seriously-ill/ Heidi Neckelmann Facebook Post https://www.facebook.com/648648976/posts/10157817790183977/?app=fbl Portuguese mother, 41, dies two days after taking Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/portuguese-mother-41-dies-two-days-after-taking-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine#When:20:36:00Z Coronavirus Vaccinations Seem to be Causing 50 Times the Adverse Events of Flu Vaccinations after Just the First of Two Shots http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2021/january/06/coronavirus-vaccinations-seem-to-be-causing-50-times-the-adverse-events-of-flu-vaccinations-after-just-the-first-of-two-shots/ UK to use AI for COVID-19 vaccine side effects https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/emea/uk-use-ai-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects NY bill would allow health officials to detain ‘suspected’ disease carriers for 60 days, force vaccines https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ny-bill-would-allow-health-officials-to-detain-suspected-disease-carriers-for-days-force-vaccines Metrics and COVID https://defendingidaho.org/articles/33/metrics-and-covid LA 'Super-Spreader Task Force' detains over 900, arrests and fines nearly 100 revelers during NYE raids https://www.theblaze.com/news/la-superspreader-taskforce-covid-lockdown Greek court sends teenager to jail for organizing small New Year’s Eve party https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/greek-court-sends-teenager-to-jail-for-organizing-small-new-years-eve-party Gearing Up for 2021, Starting in DC https://parentalrights.org/gearing-up-for-2021-starting-in-dc/ How Big Pharma Controls Medical Schools - G. Edward Griffin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arpniZXRAtQ The Politics of Cancer Therapy – A Lecture by G. Edward Griffin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9P07Jswxmc The History of the Pharma Cartel https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2007/05/the-history-of-the-pharma-cartel/ Robert Kennedy Jr. Explains Exactly What Is Going On https://newtube.app/TonyHeller/0b2MICr People traveling to Canada need negative COVID test or be quarantined in government camp https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/people-traveling-to-canada-need-negative-covid-test-or-be-quarantined-in-government-camp Israel starts Covid vaccine drive as Facebook groups taken down https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/20/facebook-takes-down-groups-spreading-lies-about-covid-vaccine-in-israel “Mass Sterilization”: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine? https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-un-tetanus-vaccine-2/5678295 Who Is Bill Gates? https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/ A 1970 Law Led to the Mass Sterilization of Native American Women. That History Still Matters https://time.com/5737080/native-american-sterilization-history/ U.S. Scientists' Role in the Eugenics Movement (1907–1939): A Contemporary Biologist's Perspective https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2757926/ Sec. Clinton Stands By Her Praise of Eugenicist Margaret Sanger https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/sec-clinton-stands-by-her-praise-of-eugenicist-margaret-sanger Remove statues of Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood founder tied to eugenics and racism https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/23/racism-eugenics-margaret-sanger-deserves-no-honors-column/5480192002/ Governments Will Want to Track Who Has Had a Covid-19 Vaccine https://www.wsj.com/articles/governments-will-want-to-track-who-has-had-a-covid-19-vaccine-11607600430 Spain to keep list of people who decline coronavirus vaccine https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/spain-keep-list-people-who-decline-coronavirus-vaccine Why Does The IMF Want Your Search History? https://defendingidaho.org/articles/54/why-does-the-imf-want-your-search-history Ivy League Study Shows How US Media Created a Climate of Fear Over COVID-19 https://fee.org/articles/ivy-league-study-shows-how-us-media-created-a-climate-of-fear-over-covid-19/ Focus on the Family sells out to coronavirus cult, says Christians should get vaccine jabbed https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-01-08-focus-on-family-coronavirus-cult-christians-jabbed.html 'Latter-day Saints are not immune': Utah Area Presidency asks members to wear face masks https://www.ksl.com/article/50000135/latter-day-saints-are-not-immune-utah-area-presidency-asks-members-to-wear-face-masks Masks a sign of ‘Christlike love’ during pandemic, apostle says https://www.deseret.com/faith/2020/12/7/22158497/mormon-lds-church-masks-covid-19-coronavirus-christlike-love-pandemic-apostle-renlund 2021 01-04 Uchtdorf - Vaccine-Masks https://vimeo.com/497114010 Episode 392 – The Future of Vaccines https://www.corbettreport.com/futurevaccines/ Apple Emotions, Threat Score, Palantir − New World Next Week https://www.corbettreport.com/apple-emotions-threat-score-palantir-%e2%88%92-new-world-next-week/