Robert F, Kennedy has put together an amazing book that exposes the fraud of vaccines in general, and Fauci in specific. The book is heavily documented, and very detailed. At this link, political commentator breaks down a lengthy summary of everything contained in the book. Amazing and eye-opening!

Robert F, Kennedy has put together an amazing book that exposes the fraud of vaccines in general, and Fauci in specific. The book is heavily documented, and very detailed. At this link, political commentator breaks down a lengthy summary of everything contained in the book. Amazing and eye-opening!

We live in a culture that is constantly told that they should just trust the "experts." In some parts of Idaho, this is adhered to very strongly. There are actually a great many things wrong with this attitude, particularly when it comes to medicine [1], but still it is pervasive in some parts. We want to believe that doctors never make business decisions when it comes to our health, but this is naive. We want to think that those in the medical profession are just kind, friend people who want to heal people. Granted, there are some who feel this way, but there are a great many doctors, and they run the spectrum where these things are concerned. Medical school isn't free, after all, nor are vacations. Even where good doctors are concerned, however, there are problems. One of these is, interestingly, the same problem that the public tends to have: a belief that those above them know what is right and shouldn't be questioned. In our current situation, there is a chain of information/direction that looks like this: The United Nations directs the World Health Organization, which directs the CDC, which directs state health departments, which direct regional health departments, which direct local health officials, who are responsible for implementation. If you trust the UN, this might not bother you. But if you understand that there are serious reasons to take what they say with skepticism, this chain is very disconcerting. Take, for instance, Event 201 [3]. This was an event, held in October of 2019, where leaders and representatives from around the world got together to war-game what would happen if there were a global outbreak of a new coronavirus. Months before there actually was a new global coronavirus outbreak, or so we're told. What an amazing coincidence! Yet another coincidence is that this "pandemic" has presented exactly the opportunity long ought after by groups like the World Economic Forum to implement what they refer to as "The Great Reset", which they see as an "opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world," according to Klaus Schwab, the WEF's founder. This is why you keep hearing about the "new normal." They have no intention of letting things go back to the real normal. “"By Schwab’s own admission, the world must “act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies” — in short, he says, ever [sic] industry must “be transformed… we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”" [2]” “"As the WEF puts it of the coming technocracy that would rule our lives: “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”" [2]” All of these things tie directly back to the United Nations Agenda 21/2030. Defending Idaho has reported on the goals of Agenda 21/2030, and we refer you to our website for those. In short, these are all evil goals couched in nice-sounding phraseology. We must all stop blindly following and start thinking critically! "Experts" are people, and people have agendas. "There is no class of evidence to be received with greater suspicion than that of the so-called expert." [4] I'm No Expert At this point, some might be wondering who they are to question those who claim to be experts. I will tell you who you are: you are the one who will suffer the consequences of whatever they implement! You have your own brain, and you were meant to use it. And you have access to the greatest expert of all – God – who will gladly guide you as you navigate conflicting information. Most importantly, you must listen to all sides of an argument. Contrary to popular memes, science is NEVER settled! Science is, literally, "a study of a subject," and it is ever-evolving. We look back with horror on the practices of days gone by (Opium for headaches? Cigarettes for your lungs?), but somehow fail to realize that those people were following the recommendation of their doctors and experts, too. In a hundred years, what will society think of today's best practices, if there still is a society? What will the "science" say then? I have been known to say that "science is today's best guesses waiting to be proven false." Whether you like it or not, this is historically accurate. But we like to think of ourselves as above all that. OUR science is too good for all that. We have "evolved" to a safe place, where things like peer reviews and double-blind studies protect us from fraud and quackery. I wish that were true. Researcher James Corbett has produced an excellent, well-documented, documentary, entitled "The Crisis of Science," that exposes the flaws – serious, serious flaws! – in today's methodologies, as discussed among scientists themselves, in their own literature, conveniently removed from the public eye. I highly recommend you watch it. [5] Just Listen We are being told that we shouldn't listen to the "other guys," that they're the cause of all our problems. We are being led to divide into factions, constantly at odds with one another. This is wrong, and it is patently un-American. Just as we have been seeing people and groups purged from sites and services like YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, so have these enormous organizations been controlling the free flow of information in other ways. Google, for instance, has long buried certain topics so far down into search results that no one will ever find them. Whistleblowers whose messages conflict with the prevailing narrative are quickly removed from public platforms before they can be seen. Truly, we live in Orwell's 1984, where this was known as "memory-holing." Media giant CNN admitted that some of these whistleblowers had been scrubbed from the main social media sites, but was quick to label them spreaders of "false coronavirus claims," so you wouldn't be concerned. [6] You weren't supposed to ask yourself why doctors would risk their livelihoods, not to mention their medical licenses, to spread "false claims." Or. what about The Great Barrington Declaration? [7] Have you even heard of it? You should have! But it's been either ignored or slandered by mainstream media publications, so you won't pay any attention to it. Why on earth would the public want to hear from "infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists [who] have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies"? What DO we get? Shut out of public meetings, where hospital administrators are admitted and allowed to give an air of legitimacy to mask mandates that we are being railroaded with. Are you not alarmed by that? I could go on, as there are many, many, other doctors and experts who disagree with the prevailing narrative. But I won't. I just hope that this has given you a sense of the urgency in our current situation, and that, going forward, you will not just blindly accept what any so-called "experts" say in regards to this "pandemic." There is a lot of reason to be skeptical, if not at least very cautious. SOURCES [1] See, for instance, the quotes from Brigham Young in the Defending Idaho article entitled "You Can Flatten The Curve". https://defendingidaho.org/articles/29/you-can-flatten-the-curve [2] Delingpole: The Great Reset Is Trending. Here’s Why… https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/11/18/the-great-reset-is-trending-heres-why/ The second quote above comes from this must-read article on the WEF website: Here's how life could change in my city by the year 2030 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/ [3] Event 201, Center For Health Security https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/ [4] I picked up this quote somewhere in my reading, but forgot to write down the proper attribution, unfortunately. A quick internet search while writing this article turned up nothing. [5] Episode 353 – The Crisis of Science, The Corbett Report https://www.corbettreport.com/sciencecrisis/ [6] Social media giants remove viral video with false coronavirus claims that Trump retweeted https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/tech/facebook-youtube-coronavirus/index.html [7] https://gbdeclaration.org/

How We Know COVID Does Not Exist On January 23, 2021, NBC News broadcast an interview in which China’s Chief epidemiologist, Dr. Wu Zunyou, said: “They didn’t isolate the virus, and that is the problem.” This was not a "conspiracy theorist" or "fringe" website, nor was this a newscast skeptical of COVID. It was an unintentional revelation of truth. In November of 2021 we learn that seven laboratories at seven universities in the United States couldn't find Covid-19 in ANY of 1,500 supposedly "positive" tests, and they are suing the CDC. Dr. Derek Knauss said: ““When my lab team and I subjected the 1500 supposedly positive Covid-19 samples to Koch’s postulates and put them under an SEM (electron microscope), we found NO Covid in all 1500 samples. We found that all 1500 samples were primarily Influenza A, and some Influenza B, but no cases of Covid. We did not use the bulls*** PCR test. When we sent the rest of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a couple of the labs at the University of California, they came up with the same result: NO COVID. They found Influenza A and B. Then we all asked the CDC for viable samples of Covid. The CDC said they can’t give them, because they don’t have those samples. So we came to the hard conclusion through all our research and lab work that Covid-19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was only called ‘Covid,’ and most of the 225,000 deaths were from co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, pulmonary emphysema, etc.. They got the flu which further weakened their immune systems, and they died."” Last but not least, we have Michael Yeadon, who was formerly the Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer for Allergy & Respiratory Research at Pfizer Pharmaceutical. He has risked his reputation to go on record claiming that "the Covid pandemic is a fraud. [In the video linked to below,] He explains why masks are useless, why distancing is absurd, why PCR tests are meaningless, why quarantining healthy people is stupid, why variants of virus strains are no threat, and why Covid vaccines should be rejected." What About Claims To The Contrary? Many of the "fact-checking" sites claim, of course, that COVID has been isolated. Here is a closer look at the claims made by the Full Fact website. To begin with, these sites always begin with dubious claims. This one says the "erroneous" claim is that "The Covid-19 virus has not been isolated as per Koch’s postulates, and this means PCR tests do not work." Notice how they frame the argument as somehow being specifically about "Koch's Postulates" and its bearing on the validity of PCR "tests." Their response is that "This is untrue. Covid-19 has been isolated many times. It does not need to adhere to Koch’s postulates as it is a virus, and Koch’s rules have been widely disregarded now. Covid-19 PCR tests are generally very accurate." Let's examine these claims individually. Has the COVID-19 virus been isolated? One article in the University of Auckland's News and Opinion section claims that there is an issue with "people sticking rigidly to a specific definition of the word isolation." The author relies on the ignorance of the general population as to how specific terminology works in fields like medicine and law. In law, words have canonical meanings that cannot change. When I use the word "consideration," you might think I am referring to thinking about something, but in legalese this word has only one meaning: what one party has offered another as an exchange for something else. This word cannot be used in a different manner in legal documents, because that would cause confusion when reading and applying older documents. Likewise in medicine, when one doctor says that a patient needs something, or that something has to be done, there cannot be room for interpretation. Of necessity, words have meaning. Therefore, isolation cannot simply mean that a sample was taken, but that the virus in question has been completely isolated from all other matter. There is only one correct definition, no matter how you argue the fact. As we have seen in the articles and quotes at the beginning of this article, multiple reliable sources have testified that COVID-19 has never been isolated, and their claims have never been met with proof, but with denial, cancellation, and name-calling. How professional! The Reuter's Fact-Checking Team, in their article on this subject, link to a 2011 British Medical Journal article wherein they say the author "has specifically rejected suggestions that purification is necessary when isolating viruses." What makes this especially interesting is the fact that this article is about HIV/AIDS, which closely mirrors our current fake pandemic in many ways. For starters, Dr. Fauci (the very same!) was put in charge of that "pandemic," and also fraudulently used the PCR methodology at that time, raising the extreme ire of Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR! Next they quote a doctor as saying that “SARS-CoV2 has been sampled millions of times over from infected people, including those originally found to be infected in China.” Again, we remind the reader of the accidental testimony of Dr. Wu Zunyou on ABC News, who let slip that “They didn’t isolate the virus, and that is the problem.” We also point the reader to an article Defending Idaho put out on July 13th, 2020, entitled, "Lies, Big Lies, and COVID-19," which contains the following: ““Crowe described a case in the literature of a woman who had been in contact with a suspect case of Corona (in Wuhan) they believed was the index case. “She was important to the supposed chain of infection because of this. They tested her 18 times, different parts of the body, like nose, throat—different PCR tests. 18 different tests. And she tested negative every time. And then they—because of her epidemiological connection with the other cases, they said: “We consider her infected. So, they had 18 negative tests and they said she was infected.” “Now why was she important? Well there was only one other person who could have theoretically transmitted the virus if the original patient, outside the family was who they thought it was. But secondly, she had the same exact symptoms as everybody else. Right? So, four people in his family came down with fever and cough and headaches, fatigue and all these kinds of big symptoms. So, if she could get those symptoms without the virus, then you, you’ve got to say, well, why couldn’t everybody else’s symptoms be explained by whatever she had? I mean, maybe they, they ate some bad seafood or something and so they all got sick, but it had nothing to do with the coronavirus.”” This doesn't exactly inspire confidence in the aforementioned samples from "infected people, including those originally found to be infected in China." We would also like to point out the following phrase from Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of a lab called Viral Forensics: “"…we haven’t yet purified the virus. And I don’t think we ever will."” Next, the Full Fact folks would have us believe that Koch’s postulates do not apply to COVID-19, since they are "not a good measure of what causes disease in 2020." It is funny, then, that the COVID-believing journal, Nature, didn't have an issue printing "Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus" back in 2003. Full Fact claims that "Koch’s postulates weren’t written for viruses," but the National Institutes of Health website saw no problem applying Koch's Postulates to "viral agents" when they published "Amending Koch's postulates for viral disease: When 'growth in pure culture' leads to a loss of virulence," back in January of 2017. Finally, Full Fact claims that "We also know that PCR tests are identifying the virus that causes Covid-19 and working well." Defending Idaho has written about this subject many times, including quotes from the creator of the PCR methodology himself, Kary Mullis, who said: “"I don't think you can misuse PCR. No, the results, the interpretation of it… See… if they could find this virus in you at all – and with PCR if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody, it starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else right. I mean because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of them in your body, okay? So that could be thought of as a misuse of it… PCR is… just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That's why it doesn't tell you that you're sick…"” Of course, the University of Auckland's News and Opinion section also thinks they know better than the actual inventor of PCR, referring to the PCR methodology as "the polymerase chain reaction test." They also claim that "The PCR test looks for specific genetic sequences that are only found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That makes it very suitable as a screening tool as it has such a low false-positive rate – people are highly unlikely to test positive unless the virus is present in the sample. We know this is true from all the thousands of negative tests we’ve seen here in New Zealand." Quick question: If a test that isn't a test comes back "negative" some of the time, does that prove that its "positives" are really positive"? Where's the science in all this "science"? The University of Auckland website even has the audacity to claim that "The most crucial thing to understand about the PCR test is that it is basically us asking: was the virus present in sufficient quantities to detect when the person was tested?" Oy… Do you people not listen to the guys who invent the tools you use/abuse? About a hundred words back, remember? "PCR is… just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something." As Dr. Mullis explained in the full video that quote comes from, you can literally have a single microbe of something in your body, and the polymerase chain reaction is capable of making it into billions of something. "That's why it doesn't tell you that you're sick…"  Another issue with this claim is that the Investigative Corona Committee Germany says: “"SARS-COV-2… was not cultivated at the beginning of the event and later has not been found in nature in the form documented as a computer file in early 2020."” To which Defending Idaho added that "The 'form documented as a computer file' – or digital model – is what hospitals and Walgreens employees have been PCR 'testing' for, in the absence of an actual isolated virus particle." Towards the end of their "fact-check" article, Full Fact claims that "PCR tests used in Covid-19 testing are extremely sensitive and specific at detecting Covid-19 and do not confuse other coronaviruses, such as ones that cause the common cold, for Covid-19." Again, they hope you are ignorant of the fact that the CDC issued a lab alert in July of 2021, recommending doctors switch to "a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses." In other words, to use new tests that can tell the difference between COVID and the flu. We here remind the reader about the opening material of this article, in which 7 universities tested 1500 samples of "people [who] tested 'positive' [for] Covid-19. ALL people were simply found to have Influenza A, and to a lesser extent Influenza B." Amazing how that works! Further Viewing/Reading: *Highly Recommended Viewing! Kary Mullis - The Full Interview with Gary Null  https://archive.org/details/kary-mullis-the-full-interview-by-gary-null-1996 ““No Infection or Illness Can be Accurately Diagnosed with the PCR Test”” Koch’s Postulates: Have They Been Proven for Viruses? https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Koch%E2%80%99s-Postulates-Dr.-Kaufman-5-4.pdf Sources: China’s Chief Epidemiologist admits COVID-19 was Never Proven to Exist https://redpilluniversity.org/chinas-chief-epidemiologist-admits-covid-19-was-never-proven-to-exist/ Laboratories in US can’t find Covid-19 in one of 1,500 positive tests https://greatreject.org/laboratories-cant-find-covid-19-in-positive-tests/ Former Head Scientist at Pfizer Says Covid Threat is 100% Fake https://redpilluniversity.org/former-head-scientist-at-pfizer-says-covid-threat-is-100-fake/ The Covid-19 virus has been isolated many times https://fullfact.org/health/Covid-isolated-virus/ Koch’s postulates, Covid, and misinformation rabbit holes https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/news/2020/11/16/kochs-postulates-covid-and-misinformation-rabbit-holes.html Fact Check-Koch’s postulates do not need to be fulfilled to prove the existence of a virus https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-koch-idUSL2N2L23F1 The politics of AIDS in South Africa: beyond the controversies https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/re-fact-incredible-it-may-sound-he-acknowledged-nothing-relevance-your-end "Fauci Doesn't Know Anything About Anything" Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize Winner & Creator of PCR Test https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WmKzrJu23o Lies, Big Lies, and COVID-19 https://defendingidaho.org/articles/lies-big-lies-and-covid-19 Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus https://www.nature.com/articles/423240a/ Amending Koch's postulates for viral disease: When “growth in pure culture” leads to a loss of virulence https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5182102/ Coronavirus Comics and Conspiracies https://defendingidaho.org/articles/coronavirus-comics-and-conspiracies Kary Mullis, Inventor of PCR Test – “PCR is not a reliable test for viruses” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT3IqZjT_9A How the PCR test works and why it’s such a critical weapon against Covid-19 https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/news/2020/09/21/how-the-pcr-test-works.html Why Won't You Get Vaccinated?!? https://defendingidaho.org/articles/why-won-t-you-get-vaccinated