COVID and the Constitution
By now you've undoubtedly heard people on one side of the mask issue claim that mandates are unconstitutional, and the other side say that it is constitutional. What is the truth? Constitutionality of the Current Use of Public Health Department Authority While Title 50, Section 304, of the Idaho Code [1] does allow cities to "establish a board of health" that can "pass all ordinances and make all regulations necessary to preserve the public health; prevent the introduction of contagious diseases into the city; [and] make quarantine laws", there is a lack of public confidence that the use of these powers is appropriate at this time. This lack of confidence began with the governor's "emergency declaration" when only one person in the state had been diagnosed with COVID-19, and his reference to this as a "pandemic." It was further questioned when he subsequently declared an "extreme emergency" despite there being no evidence that the virus was spreading wildly in the state, as actual pandemics are wont to do. Further lack of confidence has been engendered through what can only be described as unnecessarily strident measures designed to "protect" the public from a threat that has not materialized. Inasmuch as governments derive their power from the people, and inasmuch as those powers were given with the intent that they be used only when appropriate, we, the people, have withdrawn our consent for their use until such time as they are actually required, and then only when used appropriately. In other words, our representatives were given authority to act, and to do so ONLY WHEN NECESSARY. The information in the entirety of this packet sufficiently demonstrates that IT IS NOT NECESSARY AT THIS TIME. Nor was it ever. Emergency powers have been abused While powers were granted to the governor and health departments to be used in the event of actual emergencies, there is a lack of actual emergency in the current situation to justify their use. According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, "[C]oncerning the seasonal acute respiratory disease, commonly known as the flu, there is a mortality of 0.1%… That means that one in a thousand flu-infected inhabitants dies – every winter." [2] According to coronavirus.idaho.gov, as of Nov. 21, 2020, there have been 847 deaths out of 1,826,160 people [3]. 847/1826160 works out to less than 0.05%, whereas one in one thousand Idahoans would be roughly 1,826 people, or less than 0.09%. This places Idaho at less than half of the generally expected deaths for a "winter" season. We do not shut down our economy for the flu, nor impose mask mandates, or treat healthy people as criminals for going about their daily lives. We should ABSOLUTELY not be doing so now, when the death rate is less than half of a normal flu season! The Most Important Thing: Public Health Districts Cannot Pass Laws! As stated above, Title 50, Section 304, of the Idaho Code, delegates authority to the cities to establish boards of health. However, Idaho Code does not supersede the state Constitution. What does the Constitution say? Article II, Section 1 [4], states that, "The powers of the government of this state are divided into three distinct departments, the legislative, executive and judicial; and no person or collection of persons charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to one of these departments shall exercise any powers properly belonging to either of the others, except as in this constitution expressly directed or permitted." The power of the legislative branch is to enact laws. Article III, Section 1 [5], reminds us that "The legislative power of the state shall be vested in a senate and house of representatives." In other words, only the House and Senate can enact laws that are binding on the public! While health districts can make recommendations, they do not have the power to pass laws, no matter what was added to the Idaho Code in 1967! If we allow that, we no longer have "three distinct departments" of government, as mandated by our Constitution! "Boards of health" do not belong to the legislative, executive, or judicial branches, and are therefore not able to pass laws! While the other things mentioned above are true, ultimately this is the only thing that matters. SOURCES [1] https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title50/T50CH3/SECT50-304/ [2] 12 Virus Experts: The King is Naked. COVID 19, Defending Utah https://www.defendingutah.org/post/2020/03/22/german-virus-expert-the-king-is-naked-covid-19/ [3] Idaho Population 2020, World Population Review https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/idaho-population [4] https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idconst/ArtII/Sect1/ [5] https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idconst/ArtIII/Sect1/
Masks: The Science Is NOT Settled
There are many scientific articles BOTH saying masks are helpful and NOT helpful. The CDC itself has flip-flopped on this issue since the beginning of this so-called "pandemic", with Dr. Fauci contradicting himself at times. Since this issue has been a question for almost a hundred years, there have been dozens and dozens of studies done on this subject on population samples both large and small. The science is clearly NOT settled! While I had originally intended to provide lists both for and against here, I will instead direct you to the following articles, which have already done the hard work for me. An Evidence Based Scientific Analysis of Why Masks are Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful [1] This extremely thorough and well-documented article was written by Dr. Jim Meehan, MD, an ophthalmologist and preventive medicine specialist with over 20 years of experience and advanced training in immunology, inflammation, and infectious disease, and who has personally performed well over 10,000 surgical procedures. Masking Ourselves To Death: A New Essay By Mark Crispin Miller, PHD [2] Mark Crispin Miller, a professor at NYU, casts a light on our current circumstances, and points out the hypocrisy at every turn. Very long and well-written. Language warning for some of the quotations contained in this article. This article is highly-documented, particularly to sources like the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Clinical Infectious Diseases magazine. Even Some Liberals Get It In "The Coronavirus and the Right’s Scientific Counterrevolution," an article from the decidedly Leftist, pro-mask website, The New Republic, there is an admission that shifting guidelines about mask-wearing has had nothing to do with research, or evidence, or any other set of facts, but was instead about shifting opinions. “"As for the effectiveness of widespread mask usage in slowing the transmission of respiratory viruses, effectively nothing about this evidence had changed since the start of the pandemic. The evidence remains now what it was then: partial and conditional. It draws from either idealized laboratory conditions, or past outbreaks of other viruses in which randomized controls were not possible. In a rapidly shifting crisis like the present pandemic, it’s exceedingly difficult to establish even general correlations, much less firm causation. In other words, the U.S. mask advisory changed not because of what the evidence plainly dictated; rather, it was because experts’ judgment of the existing evidence had shifted. And the judgment itself was not mainly scientific—it was a prudential assessment of how the evidence should guide action." [3]” Masks Are Medical Devices It is unlawful and unhealthy to prescribe the same medical device to all people without proper medical consultation. The risks associated with this one-size-fits-all approach have been demonstrated in many instances, very few of which have been publicly disseminated via mainstream media. You've probably heard this argument before, but not from a surgeon. Well, here you go! "I'm an ophthalmic surgeon. I specialize in ocular immunology, inflammation, and infectious disease. I’ve performed over 10,000 surgical procedures wearing a surgical mask. I have suffered the detrimental effects that masks caused to my mental and physical function during long surgeries. Because most of the surgeries I performed were microscopic procedures that required fine motor skills, I changed my mask frequently to prevent the detrimental effects of arterial deoxygenation." [1] Mark Crispin Miller, PHD, in his article above [2], provides links to little-publicized articles about multiple people passing out, even dying, from improper mask wearing. Beliefs Are Not Science I will leave you with the following quote, as food for thought: “"The universal use of unscientific face coverings is closer to medieval superstition than it is to science." – Dr. Martin Kulldorff (Harvard Medical School professor) [4]” SOURCES [1] https://www.meehanmd.com/blog/2020-10-10-an-evidence-based-scientific-analysis-of-why-masks-are-ineffective-unnecessary-and-harmful/ [2] https://truthbarrier.com/masking-ourselves-to-death-new-essay-by-mark-crispin-miller-phd/ [3] The Coronavirus and the Right’s Scientific Counterrevolution, The New Republic https://newrepublic.com/article/158058/coronavirus-conservative-experts-scientific-counterrevolution [4] As quoted in "Fire Fauci!' - Trump Rally Explodes Over Coronavirus Doom And Gloomer," RonPaulLibertyReport (YouTube) https://youtu.be/0NfVMc_pFQ4?t=986
Did You Know? Masks Are OPTIONAL!
It's true! And, it's true for several different reasons. To begin with, every "mandate" in the state of Idaho has exemptions, as discussed in our article, Idaho Student-Parent Mask Opt Out Now Available! These exemptions apply to a great many people living in our state, and there is likely one that applies to you! Do you believe that face masks are protecting you or others? We encourage you to read Masks: The Science Is NOT Settled. You should also understand the intended psychological effect of mask-wearing: “[M]asks are mostly a tool of Risk Communication 101. The theory goes that if the public is given “something to do” they’ll feel empowered and less fearful. That’s not to say that some mask somewhere hasn’t prevented a virus from escaping one person and reaching another. It’s to say that the real magic in the mask is in the illusion that it’s stopping coronavirus from getting out and hurting people. Obviously it’s not. “At a minimum, you can give people some sense of control by suggesting something they can do,” wrote Dr. Peter Sandman, a crisis communications consultant who often works with government officials. Sandman was the lead lecturer at a pandemic planning conference I attended in 2005 when I worked for the state of Idaho and helped develop the state’s pandemic response plan. – Let your smile shine free: Disobey McLean’s mandates (Idaho Freedom Foundation)” If you are actually concerned about the risk of contracting COVID-19, we would point you to the following: • Video Update 2020-12-02 EXAMINING REPORTED CORONAVIRUS DEATHS • Metrics and COVID Believe it or not, there are actually even more reasons than this. For more information and analysis, use the tags below to jump to related articles and videos. And now that you know, help us spread the message! Share this article on social media, and/or print out business cards like the one that may have brought you here! [1-single_card.jpg] Click here to download a printable version of the above card (JPG). Click here to download a printable PDF of the above with 10 business cards! [2-single_card_masks_01.jpg] Click here to download a printable version of the above card (JPG). Click here to download a printable PDF of the above with 10 business cards!
The Damning Clips In One Compilation
Lots of stuff to learn from here, most of which we've touched on in articles and social media posts. From COVID fraud to major corporations harvesting your data, this is an hour-long listen, but well worth it!
Metrics and COVID
Metrics are opinionated reference points. According to Sandi Metz, a well-known author, speaker, and professional software developer, “"Metrics are, obviously, created by people, so one could argue that they merely express one individual’s opinion. That assertion, however, vastly understates their worth. Measures that rise to become metrics are backed by research that has stood the test of time. They’ve been scrutinized by many people over many years. You can think of metrics as crowd-sourced opinions."” The metrics we have heard used for mask mandates seem to be "cases" of coronavirus, and deaths attributed thereto. Since this is apparently a new form of coronavirus, nothing about it has withstood the test of time beyond a few months. Mask-wearing has been a thing for a long time, and it has definitely been researched and "scrutinized by many people over many years." Unfortunately, there is no "crowd-sourced opinion" that is settled on this issue. [See our article, Masks: The Science Is NOT Settled.] In the absence of a reliable metric concerning masks, let us turn to "cases," as determined by the PCR test. This seems to be much more straightforward. But is it? Sandi Metz continues, “"While it’s possible to disagree with the premise of a specific metric, and to insist that the thing it measures isn’t useful, the rules of mathematics require all to concede that the numbers produced by metrics are facts."” In other words, "numbers don't lie." They just are. Unfortunately, as with everything else related to this "pandemic," the numbers we are hearing about COVID-19 "cases" may actually be a lie. At best, they are highly unreliable. Dr. Scott Atlas, of Stanford University, recently tweeted: “"Marked "case" increase is not accompanied by similar increases in deaths. "Cases" is not the most important metric. #Perspective #FactsMatter" [7]” Whatever the numbers actually are, another issue is the interpretation of those numbers. We can read reports on "total cases" and "new cases," but we must take those numbers and do something with them, based on other criteria. The only criteria I am aware of related to coronavirus "cases" are the following claims: 1. They are meaningful because they represent deaths or the threat thereof. 2. They are meaningful because they represent the necessity for hospitalization, and we don't want to overwhelm hospitals (ie, we want to "flatten the curve"). Examining each of these claims reveals a sandy foundation for mask mandates to rest upon: 1. Deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the state of Idaho are currently at 874 since the "pandemic" began, as officially reported at coronavirus.idaho.gov. According to the 2020 census, the Idaho population is 1,826,160 [1]. A little math tells us that this represents less than 0.05% of the population. While every death is sad, this is hardly statistically significant, particularly in relation to seasonal flu deaths, cancer, suicide, and deaths from things like properly prescribed medications taken as prescribed [2]. For reference, that leaves greater than 99.95% of us alive. 2. Currently, the total number of "cases" since the "pandemic" began stands at 94,730, which represents roughly 5% of the population. Obviously, this leaves 95% of the population unaffected. These "cases" have been "diagnosed" over time (not all at once), and very few of them have actually "required" hospitalization. Here are the symptoms, according to the CDC [3]: “Fever or chills, Cough, Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, Fatigue, Muscle or body aches, Headache, New loss of taste or smell, Sore throat, Congestion or runny nose, Nausea or vomiting, and Diarrhea.” The CDC rather unhelpfully includes a disclaimer that the above list "does not include all possible symptoms." Interestingly, the list seems to include every symptom of every other illness or non-illness one could experience, especially during winter, none of them requiring hospitalization. Of the people I've personally known who "tested positive" for COVID-19, the vast majority have had symptoms from this list. Under the heading, "When to seek emergency medical attention", the CDC lists the following as reasons to seek emergency medical care: “Trouble breathing, Persistent pain or pressure in the chest, New confusion, Inability to wake or stay awake, or Bluish lips or face.” Most of these would be good reasons to seek help under any circumstance. Thankfully, they are not experienced by the majority of those "testing positive." The CDC does point out that "Older adults and people who have severe underlying medical conditions like heart or lung disease or diabetes seem to be at higher risk for developing more serious complications from COVID-19 illness." So, of the 5% possibly affected by COVID-19 in Idaho, most of those fall into these two categories. Why are we placing restrictions on the rest of the population, for whom the greatest risk is that they might experience symptoms generally associated with the common cold? Interestingly, many of these "severe symptoms of COVID-19" are also symptoms of anxiety. [4] For instance, the University of Washington's Medical Department has a page called "Do You Have Anxiety or COVID-19?" [5] Many people have noticed this, and some have suggested that the 24/7 reporting on coronavirus may actually be causing this anxiety. [6] So, if most people who "test positive" don't require hospitalization, what is the problem? To begin with, they are scared to death. Because of all the propaganda surrounding this supposed "pandemic," such as the rush to release a vaccine, they have no idea that the actual threat to them is extremely small. Secondly, we live in a hospital-obsessed culture, where people no longer know how to take care of themselves, which is possible for 99% of the things people go see doctors for. Defending Idaho recently published an article called, "You Can Flatten The Curve!" that addressed this societal problem, and proposed that people seek to become self-reliant. On our Facebook page, we have shared information from practitioners of inexpensive natural methods that are currently being used to treat the symptoms listed for COVID-19. As has been demonstrated here, there are currently no metrics concerning COVID-19 that can possibly be relied on to support the current response, up to and including what amounts to house arrest, and intrusion into the simplest actions of people's daily lives. Not deaths, and certainly not "cases." SOURCES [0] All Sandi Metz quotes are from her book, "99 Bottles Of OOP. A Practical Guide To Object-Oriented Design," Version 1.0.1. [1] Idaho Population 2020, World Population Review https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/idaho-population [2] New Prescription Drugs: A Major Health Risk With Few Offsetting Advantages, Harvard University Center For Ethics https://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/new-prescription-drugs-major-health-risk-few-offsetting-advantages "[P]roperly prescribed drugs… cause about 1.9 million hospitalizations a year. Another 840,000 hospitalized patients are given drugs that cause serious adverse reactions for a total of 2.74 million serious adverse drug reactions. About 128,000 people die from drugs prescribed to them." [3] Symptoms of Coronavirus, CDC https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html [4] 11 Signs and Symptoms of Anxiety Disorders, Healthline https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/anxiety-disorder-symptoms They list excessive worrying, feeling agitated, restlessness, fatigue, and difficulty concentrating. [5] https://rightasrain.uwmedicine.org/mind/stress/anxiety-or-COVID-19 [6] The Coronavirus Pandemic May Be Causing an Anxiety Pandemic, Time https://time.com/5808278/coronavirus-anxiety/ [7] As quoted (and displayed onscreen) in "Fire Fauci!' - Trump Rally Explodes Over Coronavirus Doom And Gloomer," RonPaulLibertyReport (YouTube) https://youtu.be/0NfVMc_pFQ4?t=1449
COVID and the Constitution
By now you've undoubtedly heard people on one side of the mask issue claim that mandates are unconstitutional, and the other side say that it is constitutional. What is the truth? Constitutionality of the Current Use of Public Health Department Authority While Title 50, Section 304, of the Idaho Code [1] does allow cities to "establish a board of health" that can "pass all ordinances and make all regulations necessary to preserve the public health; prevent the introduction of contagious diseases into the city; [and] make quarantine laws", there is a lack of public confidence that the use of these powers is appropriate at this time. This lack of confidence began with the governor's "emergency declaration" when only one person in the state had been diagnosed with COVID-19, and his reference to this as a "pandemic." It was further questioned when he subsequently declared an "extreme emergency" despite there being no evidence that the virus was spreading wildly in the state, as actual pandemics are wont to do. Further lack of confidence has been engendered through what can only be described as unnecessarily strident measures designed to "protect" the public from a threat that has not materialized. Inasmuch as governments derive their power from the people, and inasmuch as those powers were given with the intent that they be used only when appropriate, we, the people, have withdrawn our consent for their use until such time as they are actually required, and then only when used appropriately. In other words, our representatives were given authority to act, and to do so ONLY WHEN NECESSARY. The information in the entirety of this packet sufficiently demonstrates that IT IS NOT NECESSARY AT THIS TIME. Nor was it ever. Emergency powers have been abused While powers were granted to the governor and health departments to be used in the event of actual emergencies, there is a lack of actual emergency in the current situation to justify their use. According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, "[C]oncerning the seasonal acute respiratory disease, commonly known as the flu, there is a mortality of 0.1%… That means that one in a thousand flu-infected inhabitants dies – every winter." [2] According to coronavirus.idaho.gov, as of Nov. 21, 2020, there have been 847 deaths out of 1,826,160 people [3]. 847/1826160 works out to less than 0.05%, whereas one in one thousand Idahoans would be roughly 1,826 people, or less than 0.09%. This places Idaho at less than half of the generally expected deaths for a "winter" season. We do not shut down our economy for the flu, nor impose mask mandates, or treat healthy people as criminals for going about their daily lives. We should ABSOLUTELY not be doing so now, when the death rate is less than half of a normal flu season! The Most Important Thing: Public Health Districts Cannot Pass Laws! As stated above, Title 50, Section 304, of the Idaho Code, delegates authority to the cities to establish boards of health. However, Idaho Code does not supersede the state Constitution. What does the Constitution say? Article II, Section 1 [4], states that, "The powers of the government of this state are divided into three distinct departments, the legislative, executive and judicial; and no person or collection of persons charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to one of these departments shall exercise any powers properly belonging to either of the others, except as in this constitution expressly directed or permitted." The power of the legislative branch is to enact laws. Article III, Section 1 [5], reminds us that "The legislative power of the state shall be vested in a senate and house of representatives." In other words, only the House and Senate can enact laws that are binding on the public! While health districts can make recommendations, they do not have the power to pass laws, no matter what was added to the Idaho Code in 1967! If we allow that, we no longer have "three distinct departments" of government, as mandated by our Constitution! "Boards of health" do not belong to the legislative, executive, or judicial branches, and are therefore not able to pass laws! While the other things mentioned above are true, ultimately this is the only thing that matters. SOURCES [1] https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title50/T50CH3/SECT50-304/ [2] 12 Virus Experts: The King is Naked. COVID 19, Defending Utah https://www.defendingutah.org/post/2020/03/22/german-virus-expert-the-king-is-naked-covid-19/ [3] Idaho Population 2020, World Population Review https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/idaho-population [4] https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idconst/ArtII/Sect1/ [5] https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idconst/ArtIII/Sect1/
2020-12-21 Vaccination, Obfuscation, and Manipulation
In today's video: Do-It-Yourself COVID tests! Pretend vaccination on live TV! Facebook pretends to run VPN in order to steal your data! Zoom works with Communist China to censor live chats! The More Things Change, The More They Remain The Same! Please donate today! https://liberapay.com/defendingidaho/donate ============= FDA staff recommends watching for Bell’s palsy in Moderna and Pfizer vaccine recipients https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/15/fda-staff-recommends-watching-for-bells-palsy-in-moderna-and-pfizer-vaccine-recipients.html Suburban Hospital Temporarily Pauses Vaccinations ‘Out of Abundance of Caution' Following Adverse Reactions https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/suburban-hospital-suspends-covid-19-vaccinations-after-adverse-reactions/2398756/ Doctor Gets Vaccinated Live (Or Not) https://www.facebook.com/629166898/posts/10157583715236899/?app=fbl CDC PDF Listing Number of Health Impact Events https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf COVID-19: What you need to know about the coronavirus pandemic on 21 December https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/12/covid-19-coronavirus-pandemic-21-december/ F.D.A. Authorizes the First At-Home Coronavirus Test https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/11/17/world/covid-19-coronavirus Deleted Klaus Schwab Tweet https://www.facebook.com/731551330/posts/10157340014926331/?app=fbl Klaus Schwab Twitter Account https://twitter.com/ProfKlausSchwab Twitter, Instagram censor video of airline kicking family off for child’s refusal to mask https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/twitter-instagram-censor-video-of-airline-kicking-family-off-for-childs-refusal-to-mask#When:20:50:00Z Corona Mask Mandates: Science or Political Dogma? https://www.globalresearch.ca/mask-mandates-science-political-dogma/5732682 AUSTRALIA SUES FACEBOOK OVER ONAVO VPN IT USED AS SPYWARE https://daringfireball.net/linked/2020/12/18/australia-facebook-onavo JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CHARGES ZOOM WITH SUPPRESSING U.S. CALLS ABOUT TIANANMEN SQUARE, AT BEHEST OF CHINA https://daringfireball.net/linked/2020/12/18/zoom-china Bonus: Should You Still Use Zoom? (Hint: Security is not the Issue Anymore) https://www.allthingssecured.com/tips/stop-using-zoom/ Bonus: Zoom reinstalling itself after a minute https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AL28s9An5k Which Social Media Platform Can We Trust? https://defendingidaho.org/articles/42/which-social-media-platform-can-we-trust Hearing Without Listening https://www.pogo.org/analysis/2020/12/hearing-without-listening/ The H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic: Manipulating Data to Enrich Drug Companies https://www.globalresearch.ca/h1n1-swine-flu-pandemic-manipulating-data-enrich-drug-companies/5732700 The More Things Change, The More They Remain The Same https://www.navigationnorth.com/news/the-more-things-change-the-more-they-remain-the-same/ “Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.” https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/111024-those-who-don-t-know-history-are-doomed-to-repeat-it Public school enrollments down as parents start noticing liberal propaganda https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/public-school-enrollments-down-as-parents-start-noticing-liberal-propaganda#When:11:00:00Z The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America: A Chronological Paper Trail (1999-09-01) by Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt http://deliberatedumbingdown.com/ddd/deliberate-dumbing-down/
Posters For Businesses
Hello, Idaho business owner! I am reaching out to you today because I am disturbed by the recent rash of mask mandates sweeping across the state. This concerns me, and many other Idahoans, for a whole host of reasons, and I have attempted to address some of them in various articles on this website, but there is one that concerns me above all others. As I have attended city council meetings where mandates have been discussed, and watched Idaho mayors call for mandates in their cities, there seems to be an underlying assumption that maskless citizens are doing so out of a selfish disregard for others, and for no other reason than perhaps ignorance. It is disgusting that our representatives would lead out like this in assuming the absolute worst of people, and basically laying the blame for the rise in coronavirus "cases" on them. There is absolutely no proof that the rise in "cases" can be blamed on the maskless (this subject is addressed elsewhere on this website), and I, personally, refuse to assume the worst of my fellow citizens. As I have read the guidelines put out by local health departments, as well as the CDC, I have noticed that these guidelines are always accompanied by multiple exemptions, including "Any person with a diagnosed medical condition, mental health condition, or disability which prevents wearing a face covering". What kind of "medical condition, mental health condition, or disability" could possibly prevent someone from wearing a face covering? Let me get personal for a moment. As these mandates have gotten out of control, people like some of my long-time friends and close family members, have felt compelled to go public with extremely sensitive personal information that I was not previously aware of, about why they will not be wearing masks. The most common? Forceful rape where the perpetrator held their hand over the victim's mouth. According to 2015 data from the National Sexual Violence Resource Center, more than 21% of women in the United States will be raped at some time in their lives, and 2.6% of men. This represents almost 30 million people. Do you suppose some of them might live here in the state of Idaho? Are they exercising a selfish disregard for others, or just trying to live their lives without a constant reminder of an atrocity where they were violated? Keep in mind that, just as I was unaware that these things had happened to these people close to me, odds are that YOU also know people who have suffered in this same way, unbeknownst to you! Idaho citizens also suffer from PTSD (both from military experience and otherwise), asthma and other breathing problems (another issue that hits very close to home for me and my family, affecting 19.2 million people in the US, according to CDC statistics), debilitating anxiety (affecting 40 million adults in the United States), and others. And guess what? None of these things are any of your business. Though HIPAA guidelines may not legally prevent a business from asking why someone is not wearing a mask… should you? Would you want your wife, daughter, or friend confronted with their horrible past, or have to discuss their medical history with a non-medical layperson, in order to simply buy groceries? Those calling for mandates keep using the word "compassion". I am calling for compassion, as well. Compassion for those among us who suffer health and other problems that they did not ask for. If you would like to show compassion for your neighbors, for your community, let us begin by trusting our neighbors. When you see someone not wearing a mask, instead of outrage, why not feel a sense of compassion for their unseen suffering? With the unfortunate prevalence of just the few issues I outlined above, there is a much higher chance that this is true than that they are simply being selfish or uncaring. In this light, we invite you to copy and display the enclosed poster that declares just that. Will you experience some pushback from others in the community? More than likely. We invite you to educate them on this subject, rather than discriminate against the innocent. There is an unfortunate divide growing among our citizens, driven specifically by this issue. We invite you to be a part of the solution, and not the problem. Further, we invite you to take your concerns to the Lord, who knows all things, has all power, and certainly knows how to heal us, physically, emotionally, and socially. Love and respect, Rod Klingler Founder, Defending Idaho The following posters can be downloaded as JPGs or PDFs and printed out to hang in your place of business! Feel free to share the files or a link to this page, so everyone can know that you respect the right of Idahoans to take responsibility for their own health, and the right of those who suffer in silence to do so without being harassed! [Poster-01.jpg] Download the poster above: JPG | PDF. [Poster-02.jpg] Download the poster above: JPG | PDF. Sources: Anxiety And Depression Association Of America https://adaa.org/about-adaa/press-room/facts-statistics Asthma, CDC page https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/asthma.htm National Center For PTSD https://www.ptsd.va.gov/understand/common/common_adults.asp National Sexual Violence Resource Center https://www.nsvrc.org/statistics
Trusting the Experts
We live in a culture that is constantly told that they should just trust the "experts." In some parts of Idaho, this is adhered to very strongly. There are actually a great many things wrong with this attitude, particularly when it comes to medicine [1], but still it is pervasive in some parts. We want to believe that doctors never make business decisions when it comes to our health, but this is naive. We want to think that those in the medical profession are just kind, friend people who want to heal people. Granted, there are some who feel this way, but there are a great many doctors, and they run the spectrum where these things are concerned. Medical school isn't free, after all, nor are vacations. Even where good doctors are concerned, however, there are problems. One of these is, interestingly, the same problem that the public tends to have: a belief that those above them know what is right and shouldn't be questioned. In our current situation, there is a chain of information/direction that looks like this: The United Nations directs the World Health Organization, which directs the CDC, which directs state health departments, which direct regional health departments, which direct local health officials, who are responsible for implementation. If you trust the UN, this might not bother you. But if you understand that there are serious reasons to take what they say with skepticism, this chain is very disconcerting. Take, for instance, Event 201 [3]. This was an event, held in October of 2019, where leaders and representatives from around the world got together to war-game what would happen if there were a global outbreak of a new coronavirus. Months before there actually was a new global coronavirus outbreak, or so we're told. What an amazing coincidence! Yet another coincidence is that this "pandemic" has presented exactly the opportunity long ought after by groups like the World Economic Forum to implement what they refer to as "The Great Reset", which they see as an "opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world," according to Klaus Schwab, the WEF's founder. This is why you keep hearing about the "new normal." They have no intention of letting things go back to the real normal. “"By Schwab’s own admission, the world must “act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies” — in short, he says, ever [sic] industry must “be transformed… we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”" [2]” “"As the WEF puts it of the coming technocracy that would rule our lives: “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”" [2]” All of these things tie directly back to the United Nations Agenda 21/2030. Defending Idaho has reported on the goals of Agenda 21/2030, and we refer you to our website for those. In short, these are all evil goals couched in nice-sounding phraseology. We must all stop blindly following and start thinking critically! "Experts" are people, and people have agendas. "There is no class of evidence to be received with greater suspicion than that of the so-called expert." [4] I'm No Expert At this point, some might be wondering who they are to question those who claim to be experts. I will tell you who you are: you are the one who will suffer the consequences of whatever they implement! You have your own brain, and you were meant to use it. And you have access to the greatest expert of all – God – who will gladly guide you as you navigate conflicting information. Most importantly, you must listen to all sides of an argument. Contrary to popular memes, science is NEVER settled! Science is, literally, "a study of a subject," and it is ever-evolving. We look back with horror on the practices of days gone by (Opium for headaches? Cigarettes for your lungs?), but somehow fail to realize that those people were following the recommendation of their doctors and experts, too. In a hundred years, what will society think of today's best practices, if there still is a society? What will the "science" say then? I have been known to say that "science is today's best guesses waiting to be proven false." Whether you like it or not, this is historically accurate. But we like to think of ourselves as above all that. OUR science is too good for all that. We have "evolved" to a safe place, where things like peer reviews and double-blind studies protect us from fraud and quackery. I wish that were true. Researcher James Corbett has produced an excellent, well-documented, documentary, entitled "The Crisis of Science," that exposes the flaws – serious, serious flaws! – in today's methodologies, as discussed among scientists themselves, in their own literature, conveniently removed from the public eye. I highly recommend you watch it. [5] Just Listen We are being told that we shouldn't listen to the "other guys," that they're the cause of all our problems. We are being led to divide into factions, constantly at odds with one another. This is wrong, and it is patently un-American. Just as we have been seeing people and groups purged from sites and services like YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, so have these enormous organizations been controlling the free flow of information in other ways. Google, for instance, has long buried certain topics so far down into search results that no one will ever find them. Whistleblowers whose messages conflict with the prevailing narrative are quickly removed from public platforms before they can be seen. Truly, we live in Orwell's 1984, where this was known as "memory-holing." Media giant CNN admitted that some of these whistleblowers had been scrubbed from the main social media sites, but was quick to label them spreaders of "false coronavirus claims," so you wouldn't be concerned. [6] You weren't supposed to ask yourself why doctors would risk their livelihoods, not to mention their medical licenses, to spread "false claims." Or. what about The Great Barrington Declaration? [7] Have you even heard of it? You should have! But it's been either ignored or slandered by mainstream media publications, so you won't pay any attention to it. Why on earth would the public want to hear from "infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists [who] have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies"? What DO we get? Shut out of public meetings, where hospital administrators are admitted and allowed to give an air of legitimacy to mask mandates that we are being railroaded with. Are you not alarmed by that? I could go on, as there are many, many, other doctors and experts who disagree with the prevailing narrative. But I won't. I just hope that this has given you a sense of the urgency in our current situation, and that, going forward, you will not just blindly accept what any so-called "experts" say in regards to this "pandemic." There is a lot of reason to be skeptical, if not at least very cautious. SOURCES [1] See, for instance, the quotes from Brigham Young in the Defending Idaho article entitled "You Can Flatten The Curve". https://defendingidaho.org/articles/29/you-can-flatten-the-curve [2] Delingpole: The Great Reset Is Trending. Here’s Why… https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/11/18/the-great-reset-is-trending-heres-why/ The second quote above comes from this must-read article on the WEF website: Here's how life could change in my city by the year 2030 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/ [3] Event 201, Center For Health Security https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/ [4] I picked up this quote somewhere in my reading, but forgot to write down the proper attribution, unfortunately. A quick internet search while writing this article turned up nothing. [5] Episode 353 – The Crisis of Science, The Corbett Report https://www.corbettreport.com/sciencecrisis/ [6] Social media giants remove viral video with false coronavirus claims that Trump retweeted https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/tech/facebook-youtube-coronavirus/index.html [7] https://gbdeclaration.org/
Did You Know? Masks Are OPTIONAL!
It's true! And, it's true for several different reasons. To begin with, every "mandate" in the state of Idaho has exemptions, as discussed in our article, Idaho Student-Parent Mask Opt Out Now Available! These exemptions apply to a great many people living in our state, and there is likely one that applies to you! Do you believe that face masks are protecting you or others? We encourage you to read Masks: The Science Is NOT Settled. You should also understand the intended psychological effect of mask-wearing: “[M]asks are mostly a tool of Risk Communication 101. The theory goes that if the public is given “something to do” they’ll feel empowered and less fearful. That’s not to say that some mask somewhere hasn’t prevented a virus from escaping one person and reaching another. It’s to say that the real magic in the mask is in the illusion that it’s stopping coronavirus from getting out and hurting people. Obviously it’s not. “At a minimum, you can give people some sense of control by suggesting something they can do,” wrote Dr. Peter Sandman, a crisis communications consultant who often works with government officials. Sandman was the lead lecturer at a pandemic planning conference I attended in 2005 when I worked for the state of Idaho and helped develop the state’s pandemic response plan. – Let your smile shine free: Disobey McLean’s mandates (Idaho Freedom Foundation)” If you are actually concerned about the risk of contracting COVID-19, we would point you to the following: • Video Update 2020-12-02 EXAMINING REPORTED CORONAVIRUS DEATHS • Metrics and COVID Believe it or not, there are actually even more reasons than this. For more information and analysis, use the tags below to jump to related articles and videos. And now that you know, help us spread the message! Share this article on social media, and/or print out business cards like the one that may have brought you here! [1-single_card.jpg] Click here to download a printable version of the above card (JPG). Click here to download a printable PDF of the above with 10 business cards! [2-single_card_masks_01.jpg] Click here to download a printable version of the above card (JPG). Click here to download a printable PDF of the above with 10 business cards!
Lies, Big Lies, and COVID-19
Even though we are now several months into this whole Coronavirus/COVID-19 experience, it is still difficult to know what the truth is. About the virus itself, the response to the virus, future treatment options. While some things are still up in the air, there are several things we can be certain about, and they are discussed below. These are articles you probably have not seen before, and much of the information will be new to you. Please read them. They come from many different places, from mainstream news sources to the blogs of scientists. The main points are these, in no particular order: 1. The various responses to the Coronavirus all serve the agenda of the United Nations, of which the World Health organization (WHO) is a part. 2. These responses all serve to remove our freedoms and increase the surveillance state. 3. The testing and classification of who "has" COVID-19 is an unscientific farce. We have arbitrarily chosen to list these articles in chronological order. Each article is accompanied by our commentary, usually with a relevant quote from the article itself. We hope that the following will help you understand why so many people are a) refusing to wear a mask, and b) concerned about where this is all leading! Smartphone data reveal which Americans are social distancing (and not) March 24, 2020 https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/03/24/social-distancing-maps-cellphone-location/ “If you have a smartphone, you’re probably contributing to a massive coronavirus surveillance system.” Interestingly, the Washington Post pointed out from the very beginning how this incident was immediately being used to thrust us all into the deep surveillance state. This was months before Apple and Google secretly installed contact tracing apps on our smartphones. Oh wait, it was just a "framework" for said apps to work? That's much better. 'Heartbreaking': Moms could be separated from their newborns under coronavirus guidelines March 26, 2020 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/03/26/pregnant-women-covid-19-could-separated-babies-birth/2907751001/ People said this would never happen. Guess what? It did. More than once. Here are some screenshots we received from People's Rights on June 10th: [1-People's Rights Text 01.jpg] The recipients responded immediately, and this follow-up text was sent about 3 hours later: [2-People's Rights Text 02.jpg] After about 5 hours total, the situation came to a positive conclusion: [3-People's Rights Text 03.jpg] Those parents were lucky enough to have a connection to the People's Rights group. Others are at least being threatened. The following was posted on Facebook within the past week: [4-St Luke's FB Msg.jpg] While the first story, with the text messages, above, had to do with a hospital in Washington State, this is in reference to St. Luke's Hospital, here in Boise, Idaho. COVID-19 Phone Location Tracking: Yes, It’s Happening Now—Here’s What You Should Know March 27, 2020 https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2020/03/27/covid-19-phone-location-tracking-its-moving-fast-this-is-whats-happening-now/ “ [T]here was an acknowledgement of this darker data mining in comments made by Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu on march 14. “All means will be used to fight the spread of the coronavirus,” he said, before referencing the use of the country’s counter-terror tech. “that until today I have refrained from using among the civilian population.”” Counter-terror technology will be used against the public… to fight coronavirus? That doesn't sound dystopian in any way, whatsoever, does it? PLEASE NOTE: We consider the following article to be the most important article on this page! If you do not read anything else, read this! Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? April 8, 2020 https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/ We include here a collection of especially poignant statements from this article, but sincerely urge you to read it in its entirety! We apologize in advance for some of the language. ““What do we mean when we say a person “tests positive” for Covid-19? We don’t actually mean they have been found to “have” it. We’ve been hijacked by our technologies, but left illiterate about what they actually mean. In this case, I am in the rare position of having known, spent time with, and interviewed the inventor of the method used in the presently available Covid-19 tests, which is called PCR, (Polymerase Chain Reaction.)”” Note that PCR is the primary means of testing for coronavirus in use today. ““The number of “cases” is often a very big number, back-lit in red. Today for example, the number of “total cases,” in the US, according to Worldometer, is 309,728. The total death figure is 8,441. “Active cases,” is 286,546, of which 8,206 are “Serious, Critical.” The number of “new deaths” is 1,037, and the number of “total recovered” is 14,741. I’m not clear what an “active” case is. Does that mean fully symptomatic? Partially symptomatic? If the latter, it surely encompasses influenza/pneumonia, which has magically, as many have observed, dropped off a cliff for 2020.”” We often forget that definitions matter! Everyone keeps talking about "cases," and "spikes," without ever defining what they mean. In this situation, even the subtle nuances have vast consequences! ““Austrian MD Christian Fiala [wrote:] “during the first weeks most tests were done on sick people. Therefore, the percentage of positive tests was relatively high. But there are not so many sick people and with the general roll out of tests, the vast majority of those tested will be healthy. Consequently, the percentage of positive tests will be low, and most will be false positive. In other words, it is impossible to continue the increase of positive test results.”” Catch that? You probably need to read it again. “““You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it,” Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics told me. “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”” "I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true." Yes, he actually said that, and yes, that is, as we said earlier, the primary test being used for coronavirus today! “I asked Dr. Rasnick what advice he has for people who want to be tested for COVID-19. “Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me,” he replies. “No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.”” To be clear, the PRC test was not meant to be used for its current task. Its results are extremely unreliable for this purpose. “… “Every time somebody takes a swab, a tissue sample of their DNA, it goes into a government database. It’s to track us,” says David Rasnick. “They’re not just looking for the virus. Please put that in your article.””” We had privately surmised that this might be the case, so we felt it important to include a scientist's comments on the matter. ““Yes, you read that right. Labs can manipulate how many 'cases’ of Covid-19 their country has.”” You'll have to read the article for the technical explanation of how this works, but it is apparently quite simple. “““There was a famous Chinese paper that estimated that if you’re testing asymptomatic people, up to 80% of positives could be false positive. That was kind of shocking, so shocking that PubMed had to withdraw the abstract even though the Chinese paper appears to still be published and available. I actually have a translation with a friend. I translated it into English and it’s a really, standard calculation of what they call positive predictive value. The abstract basically said that in asymptomatic populations, the chance of a positive coronavirus test being a true positive is only about 20%. 80% will be false positive.” “Doesn’t that mean the test means nothing?” I asked. “The Chinese analysis was a mathematical analysis, a standard, the standard analysis that’s been done a million times before. There’s no reason to withdraw the paper for any reason. There’s nothing dramatic about the paper. It’s a really boring analysis. It’s just that they did the standard analysis and said, in some populations, like they estimated 1% of people are actually infected in the population. You could have 80% false positive. Uh, they couldn’t do a real analysis of false positives in terms of determining whether a test is correct or not because that requires a gold standard and the only gold standard is purification of the virus. So, we get back to the fact that the virus is not being purified. If you could purify the virus, then you could take a hundred people who tested positive and you could search for the virus in them. And if you found the virus in 50 out of a hundred and not in the other 50, you could say that the test is only accurate 50% of the time. But we have no way to do that because we haven’t yet purified the virus. And I don’t think we ever will.””” "[W]e haven’t yet purified the virus." According to the article, this means that no one has actually isolated it yet, to pinpoint what it is exactly, and what gives it its own specific identity. Yep. ““Crowe described a case in the literature of a woman who had been in contact with a suspect case of Corona (in Wuhan) they believed was the index case. “She was important to the supposed chain of infection because of this. They tested her 18 times, different parts of the body, like nose, throat—different PCR tests. 18 different tests. And she tested negative every time. And then they—because of her epidemiological connection with the other cases, they said: “We consider her infected. So, they had 18 negative tests and they said she was infected.” “Now why was she important? Well there was only one other person who could have theoretically transmitted the virus if the original patient, outside the family was who they thought it was. But secondly, she had the same exact symptoms as everybody else. Right? So, four people in his family came down with fever and cough and headaches, fatigue and all these kinds of big symptoms. So, if she could get those symptoms without the virus, then you, you’ve got to say, well, why couldn’t everybody else’s symptoms be explained by whatever she had? I mean, maybe they, they ate some bad seafood or something and so they all got sick, but it had nothing to do with the coronavirus.”” So, it goes something like this: "Um, boss? 18 tests and no dice. What do we do?" "Well, without her the whole thing falls apart." "So…" "She's positive, of course! Lock her up!" ““Another interesting thing is that they did a lot of tests. The first person in the list of people tested, he was positive on three out of 11 tests. So again, they took nose and throat samples and you know, different methods and all this kind of stuff. And they got 11 separate tests and only three were positive. And of course, all you need to be considered infected is one positive test. They could test you 20 times and if you test positive once, then you’re infected. So, a positive test is meaningful. A negative test. It’s like, eh. Not so much.”” What kind of test comes back positive 3 out of 11 times? And what kind of doctor/scientists relies on such sketchy tests?!? US: Hospitals Get Paid $13K to List Patients as COVID-19 and $39K to Put Them on a Ventilator April 9, 2020 https://needtoknow.news/2020/04/us-hospitals-get-paid-13k-to-list-patients-as-covid-19-and-39k-to-put-them-on-a-ventilator “Republican state senator Scott Jensen, who is also a medical doctor, says the AMA is encouraging doctors to over-count coronavirus deaths. He revealed that “Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you get $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much.” Several days ago, he told local media he received a directive from the Minnesota Department of Health to list COVID-19 as the cause of death on death certificates even if patients were never tested for it. –G. Edward Griffin” This one is well-known by now, but we think it is entirely undervalued! Hospitals are businesses! This is a major conflict of interests! James Corbett also mentioned recently that putting someone on a ventilator is a serious medical intervention, and that, on a regular day, something on the order of 40% of people put on them die! But, oh, that was coronavirus. Governors of 10 States Will Require ‘Contact Tracing’ to Reopen April 15, 2020 https://needtoknow.news/2020/05/governors-of-10-states-will-require-contact-tracing-to-reopen If you look at the date, you will notice that this was already the language back when we were roughly a month into this whole debacle! It's almost as if it was previously decided. Dr. Ngozi Ezike | How COVID Deaths are Classified April 27, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw9Ci2PZKZg&feature=youtu.be “Everyone who is listed as a COVID death, doesn’t mean that was the cause of death, but that they had COVID at the time of death.” This is another one of those things most people (should) know about by now, but again is super important, as it means that the numbers being reported as "COVID deaths" are really, really not that. This also represents another conflict of interests, as there is big money for hospitals for reporting COVID deaths (this is discussed below). Gov. Little plans to distribute $300 million in cash grants to small businesses as state enters Stage 1 of reopening April 30, 2020 https://gov.idaho.gov/pressrelease/gov-little-plans-to-distribute-300-million-in-cash-grants-to-small-businesses-as-state-enters-stage-1-of-reopening/ Our "conservative" governor, here in Idaho, made sure to declare us to be in a state of "extreme emergency" right from the start, when we had exactly zero deaths, and only a small number of "cases". This assured him approximately $1.3 BILLION in federal funds. Declare non-existent pandemic. Check. Get loads of "free money." Check. Hooray for "redistributing the wealth!" New York Funeral Directors Say COVID-19 Deaths are Greatly Exaggerated April 30, 2020 https://needtoknow.news/2020/05/new-york-funeral-directors-say-covid-19-deaths-are-greatly-exaggerated/ “James O’Keefe of Project Veritas spoke to several funeral directors in New York who say the number of reported COVID-19 death is greatly exaggerated and that no one is testing. Funeral director Michael Lanza said that it was his opinion that NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio is looking for federal funding and, the more COVID death certificate they can create, the more federal funds they receive.” -G. Edward Griffin” It is more than appropriate that this article follows the one above. The Farce and Diabolical Agenda of A “Universal Lockdown” May 1, 2020 https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-cruelty-universal-lockdown/5710798 “On January 30, WHO declared COVID-19 a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). At that time, there were only 150 known COVID-19 cases outside of China. No reason whatsoever to declare a pandemic.” Golly gee, it's almost like this was just an excuse for a planned incident…! Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Suggests People Who Promote Gatherings On Social Media Will Face Legal Action May 3, 2020 https://www.dailywire.com/news/chicago-mayor-lori-lightfoot-suggests-people-who-promote-gatherings-on-social-media-will-face-legal-action “So, that means if you host a party, if you promote a party, if you go to a party, we’re not playing games, we mean business and we are going to shut this down one way or the other,” Lightfoot continued. “The time for educating people into compliance is over, don’t be stupid don’t come out, don’t advertise on social media, we’re watching you and we are going to take decisive action.”” This woman is an utter fool, as demonstrated by her recently recorded comments about wanting to hire city employees who pledge allegiance to the New World Order, but note the theme here: Stop thinking for yourselves! Big Brother knows what's best for you! Not only surveillance state, but promoting the police state, as well. * Fact-checking sites claim that the mayor's comments were somehow altered or taken out of context. We think the linked video makes it pretty clear that this is untrue. Tanzania suspends laboratory head after president questions coronavirus tests May 4, 2020 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-tanzania/tanzania-suspends-laboratory-head-after-president-questions-coronavirus-tests-idUSKBN22G295 “Tanzania has suspended the head of its national health laboratory in charge of testing for the coronavirus and ordered an investigation, a day after President John Magufuli questioned the tests’ accuracy. Magufuli said on Sunday the imported test kits were faulty as they had returned positive results on a goat and a pawpaw — among several non-human samples submitted for testing, with technicians left deliberately unaware of their origins.” Oopsies. Well, that doesn't inspire trust in those tests, now, does it? Fever-detecting Drones and Other Intrusive Practices Grow Under COVID-19 May 4, 2020 https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/35634-fever-detecting-drones-and-other-intrusive-practices-grow-under-covid-19 “Fever-reading drones, thermal cameras, and other coronavirus policies are part of “a looming wave of intrusive technology and constitutionally questionable measures pushed by governments — from local to state to federal — under the mission of protecting a fearful community,”” Notice how fear-mongering plays into this. If they can keep you afraid, you won't fight them when they take away your freedoms. Whistleblower: CBS News Staged Fake COVID-19 Testing Line In Michigan May 6, 2020 https://needtoknow.news/2020/05/whistleblower-cbs-news-staged-fake-covid-19-testing-line-in-michigan “An insider came forward to Project Veritas with hidden camera recordings revealing how CBS News organized a fake coronavirus testing line at the Cherry Health facility in Grand Rapids, and used “fake patients” recruited from the medical staff to make the CBS news report look authentic. CBS denied staging the event and removed the Cherry Health portion from the piece.” -G. Edward Griffin” This was back when all the talk was still about "flattening the curve" (ie, keeping the hospitals from being overwhelmed with sick and dying), and all the mainstream media outlets were talking about huge lines for testing. All the while, emergency tents were being taken down because they never saw a single person. ’60 Minutes’ Exposes 1976 Swine Flu Hoax & Mass Vaccine Injuries That Followed May 7, 2020 https://needtoknow.news/2020/05/60-minutes-exposes-1976-swine-flu-hoax-mass-vaccine-injuries-that-followed/ “In 1976, the US government declared that everyone should take a vaccine to stop a national pandemic from the Swine flu. At that time, the US had a population of 218-million people, and 46-million took the vaccine. Four-thousand were injured by the vaccine and filed lawsuits for-$3.5 billion. Most of the claims were for neurological damage and death. According to 60 Minutes, the vaccine was never even tested, although the media propaganda proclaimed that it was safe and effective – and necessary to prevent the spread of a pandemic that never was.” -G. Edward Griffin” Sound familiar? We wonder why so many people are publicly declaring their opposition to this exact same scenario? It's almost like they don't want to repeat history, or something. Dr. Birx Reportedly Believes Coronavirus Death Toll Inflated By Up To 25% May 11, 2020 https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/11/doctor-deborah-birx-coronavirus-covid-19-death-toll-inflated-numbers-cases-cdc-white-house-meeting-report/ “Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House coronavirus task force response coordinator, believes some official COVID-19 statistics like death tolls may be inflated by up to 25%, a new report states.” Again with the inflated death tolls. State to invest $7M in boosting contact tracing ability May 12, 2020 https://www.idahopress.com/coronavirus/state-to-invest-7m-in-boosting-contact-tracing-ability/article_6f1f4e8e-f0ae-5c92-bfbd-283f8f76de00.html Idaho will be spending $7 MILLION to track our every move. For a "pandemic" that still does not exist. CDC acknowledges mixing up coronavirus testing data May 21, 2020 https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/499085-cdc-acknowledges-mixing-up-coronavirus-testing-data What? The "professionals" at the CDC mixed up some unrelated and completely different data, and reported it as one number? That's hard to believe! (Note: We don't.) Also, other professionals also find it hard to believe, as evidenced by the quotes in the next article: ‘How Could the CDC Make That Mistake?’ May 21, 2020 https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/05/cdc-and-states-are-misreporting-covid-19-test-data-pennsylvania-georgia-texas/611935/ “The government’s disease-fighting agency is conflating viral and antibody tests, compromising a few crucial metrics that governors depend on to reopen their economies.” Remember that article with a ton of quotes, above? The one we said was super-important? Yeah, so that PRC test that was declared by its creator as unfit for medical diagnosis is the same one "that governors depend on to reopen their economies". That shouldn't concern you at all, though. Doctor Says COVID-19 Death Statistics are Criminally Fraudulent May 26, 2020 https://redpilluniversity.org/2020/05/27/doctor-says-covid-19-death-statistics-are-criminally-fraudulent/ “Dr. Pamela Popper, teacher and consultant in the field of nutrition-based medicine, reviews the COVID-19 death statistics and shows they are deliberately falsified to make the numbers larger than they really are.” "Deliberately." Before face masks, Americans went to war against seat belts May 26, 2020 https://www.businessinsider.com/when-americans-went-to-war-against-seat-belts-2020-5 This crappy article correctly identifies this as yet another step in the war of coercion versus liberty, and basically claims that since we allowed the federal government to take away our freedom previously, we should not have a problem with it now. Which, itself, is actually the problem. Oregon uses coronavirus data to make decisions about reopening. It refuses to release that data. June 3, 2020 https://www.oregonlive.com/coronavirus/2020/06/oregon-uses-coronavirus-data-to-make-decisions-about-reopening-it-refuses-to-release-that-data.html This is just like how NIST has still never released their data for calculating the collapse of WTC7, or Pelosi saying we could find out what was in the Obamacare bill after it had passed. Frankly, we don't trust anyone, especially not government. US company rolls out ‘health pass’ app to block ‘unhealthy’ users from airports, workplace June 4, 2020 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-company-rolls-out-health-pass-app-to-block-unhealthy-users-from-airports-workplace “The 'health pass' service is being marketed for businesses to scan arriving employees at a workplace, giving them a passing or failing COVID-19 grade, which determines whether they can enter.” With tests that arbitrarily deem you positive or negative for coronavirus, now we have businesses and other locations who will use that to determine whether or not you have access to, say, your job. Choose not to comply with ridiculous mandates or policies because you now know how stupid this whole thing is? Too bad. You will be treated like a criminal. Didn't anyone else see that Black Mirror episode? French contact tracing app lays groundwork for ‘techno-police,’ group warns June 4, 2020 https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/french-contract-tracing-app-lays-groundwork-for-techno-police-group-warns “The app, called StopCovid, has raised a number of concerns regarding individual freedom and anonymity among both left-wing and right-wing citizens' rights groups.” Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is ‘very rare,’ WHO says June 8, 2020 https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html What's "funny" is that the very next day, the WHO publicly denied this to be the case. Whew! That was a close one! If true, this would have meant an end to everything the UN has been able to convince people to implement so far. Think of all the Agenda 21/2030 goals they’ve suddenly been able to force on us that would no longer make any sense! Rights Suspended Under Martial Law and Active Duty Chapter of Idaho Code June 17, 2020 https://healthfreedomidaho.org/martial-law-rights-suspended/ This one will give you an overview of what dictatorial powers Governor Little has assumed while we are in a "state of emergency," and help to explain why he keeps extending it. It Finally Happened: Child Taken Due to COVID-19 June 17, 2020 https://parentalrights.org/it-finally-happened-child-taken-due-to-covid-19/ “Today in dependency court madness, LA County Dept. of Children and Family Services (DCFS) recommended that the court remove my client’s child from their physical custody after the parent tested positive for COVID-19. This is a non-offending parent. The judge ruled in favor of DCFS and detained.” As shown previously, these things are happening, but they aren't being made public! People's Rights got involved in the other case, which kept it from ending up on the news. Here, the individual's attorney is bringing it to light, although they are unable to provide details. Oregon health officials ‘have not seen any evidence’ of coronavirus spread at protests June 18, 2020 https://www.oregonlive.com/coronavirus/2020/06/oregon-health-officials-have-not-seen-any-evidence-of-coronavirus-spread-at-protests.html “[A]fter 21 days of statewide protests… some of them drawing thousands of participants, health officials know of only a handful of coronavirus patients who said they attended one.” For many people, this was when the silliness started to set in. You know, "as long as you are out being a Social Justice Warrior, you're magically protected from coronavirus!" Our Endless State of "Emergency" and De Facto Dictatorship June 25, 2020 https://mises.org/power-market/our-endless-state-emergency-and-de-facto-dictatorship “But even this highly moderate view of Hayek's would be an immense improvement from the current status quo, which is one in which governors can appoint themselves de facto dictators for an open-ended amount of time, and in which the only way of ending the one-man rule is for the legislature to take extraordinary measures.” This accurately describes what has happened here in Idaho. Modelers Were ‘Astronomically Wrong’ in COVID-19 Predictions, Says Leading Epidemiologist—and the World Is Paying the Price July 2, 2020 https://fee.org/articles/modelers-were-astronomically-wrong-in-covid-19-predictions-says-leading-epidemiologist-and-the-world-is-paying-the-price/ While this article isn't earth-shattering, it was a good excuse to post that title. The Recent Spikes in COVID-19 Cases Represents a Patently Fake Increase July 7, 2020 http://stateofthenation.co/?p=19396 “New definitions for designating Covid-19 cases have been distributed by the Department of State Health Services in Texas… In the new case definition contact tracing is included to report other people who were in contact with the one person who physically tested positive.” So, in Texas, "cases" now include anyone they can trace to a person who has tested positive, Whether or not they have been tested themselves, and whether or not they are sick. Makes sense… OPERATION COVID-19 is pushing Western Civilization into the Third World July 7, 2020 http://stateofthenation.co/?p=19415 Large and powerful organizations like the World Economic Forum are currently planning to use this “pandemic” as a way to push something called “The Great Reset,” about which they say: “”…the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.”” This is another of the most important things we hope you will take away from this article. Globalists want to use it–and are using it!–to destroy everything we hold dear. My investigation of COVID-19 July 7, 2020 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/07/07/my-investigation-of-covid-19/ “Drug companies make money on the vaccine and the drugs used to treat COVID-19 patients. State governments receive federal money to “fight the virus.” Researchers win promotions. Public health agencies obtain more funding, and more power. Financiers buy up devalued properties at bargain prices. At the top of the ladder, key plotters contrive selling the story of a new killer virus, because they intend to use it to lock down the planet. Why? Because they want to torpedo economies and move in on the wreckage and build a new economic, social, and political world order.” Jon Rappaport is a good journalist, but this is the most important quote from this article, and it belongs right here, beneath the article above. Should We Trust The Covid Tests? Jul7 8, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hac3ibzFf2E Many people do not know that former presidential candidate, Senator Ron Paul, is also a doctor. They discuss, among other things, the fact that a professional baseball player has received two positive and two negative test results within a period of 10 days. “[T]wo Texas counties are threatening felony charges against those with positive tests who do not stay home.” Does this make sense when “It’s No Longer a Felony to Knowingly Infect Someone with HIV-AIDS in California“? Well, it makes about as much sense as letting actual criminals out of jail because coronavirus, just to turn around and put people in jail because they violated lockdown orders by going to church. Politics Influences the Science of COVID-19 July 8, 2020 https://joshmitteldorf.scienceblog.com/2020/07/08/politics-influences-the-science-of-covid-19/ “I’m writing here about two issues: (1) Numbers reported by CDC have been gamed to make it appear that America is in the second wave of a pandemic. Instead of reporting COVID deaths, they began reported COVID cases. Then they conflated recovered individuals (who test positive for antibodies) with current cases (who test positive for the active virus). No wonder numbers are rising! (2) A new report featured prominently in Nature purports to show that lockdowns have stemmed the spread of the virus and have saved lives. The article is by the same team whose flawed models produced apocalyptic predictions last March that justified lockdowns in Europe and the US.” Another good article that deserves a full read-through. 3 States Account for 42 Percent of All COVID-19 Deaths in America. Why? July 9, 2020 https://fee.org/articles/3-states-account-for-42-percent-of-all-covid-19-deaths-in-america-why/ “In some ways, COVID-19 data are like a Rorschach blot from which writers, politicians, and experts can glean whatever conclusions they wish to find.” These three states skew the numbers for the entire country. NBC Guest Doctor Who Was Suffering from Coronavirus in Hospital in TV Interviews — NEVER HAD CORONAVIRUS! July 10, 2020 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/wow-nbc-guest-doctor-suffering-coronavirus-hospital-tv-interviews-never-coronavirus-video/ “An NBC medical expert who was brought on air nearly a dozen times to detail his struggle with COVID-19 never had the virus, he revealed this week.” More shenanigans from the mainstream media, as they try to push the official narrative about coronavirus. And they wonder why people no longer trust them. Further Research The people over at FreedomMan.org have also assembled a bunch of articles on this topic, which you may find interesting: List of Fake News and Propaganda About COVID-19 https://freedomman.org/2020/fake-news-and-propaganda-about-covid-19/ Credits Coronavirus used in cover image: centennialco.gov